Ex Parte Schneider et al - Page 1



             The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
                    for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.        

                  UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                           
                                     ____________                                     
                       BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                             
                                AND INTERFERENCES                                     
                                     ____________                                     
                             Ex parte JOHN H. SCHNEIDER,                              
                        DONALD L. CREVIER, STEVEN AUSNIT,                             
                       MICHAEL MCMAHON, LAWRENCE SHARE,                               
                       ERIC P. PLOURDE AND ROBERT R. HOGAN                            
                                     ____________                                     
                                   Appeal 2006-3080                                   
                                 Application 10/336,954                               
                                Technology Center 3700                                
                                     ____________                                     
                                Decided:  April 30, 2007                              
                                     ____________                                     
            Before BRADLEY R. GARRIS, CHARLES F. WARREN, and                          
            JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judges.                           
            GARRIS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                      


                                DECISION ON APPEAL                                    
                 We AFFIRM.                                                           
                 This is a decision on an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the final 
            rejection of claims 10-12, 14, 16, and 17.                                






Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013