Ex Parte Kikuchi et al - Page 3


                 Appeal No.  2006-3084                                                          Page 3                   
                 Application No.  10/673,860                                                                             
                 said nucleic acid sequence encoding said signal peptide region.  Third, the                             
                 AJ12036 bacterium or mutant thereof is able to secrete the heterologous protein                         
                 at least 2-fold higher than the wild type Corynebacterium glutamicum                                    
                 ATCC13869 having said genetic expression construct.                                                     


                                                     DISCUSSION                                                          
                        According to the examiner (Answer, page 6), appellants’ specification                            
                 provides adequate written descriptive support for methods that use strain                               
                 AJ12036.  Nevertheless, the examiner finds (Answer, bridging sentence, pages                            
                 5-6) that appellants’ disclosure is not “descriptive of the complete structure of a                     
                 representative number of species encompassed by the claims as one of skill in                           
                 the art cannot envision all the methods utilizing the encompassed mutant                                
                 coryneform bacteria, based on the teachings of the specification.”  As we                               
                 understand it, the examiner’s concern is focused solely on the aspect of                                
                 appellants’ claim relating to a mutant Corynebacterium glutamicum AJ12036                               
                 (FERM BP-734) bacterium.                                                                                
                        In this regard, the examiner finds (Answer, page 4), “[t]he specification                        
                 discloses that mutants may include any strains obtained by mutagenesis and                              
                 selection procedures for increased secretory properties (page 10 of the                                 
                 specification).”  While this is true, appellants’ claimed invention is not directed to                  
                 any mutated strain.  Instead, as appellants explain (Brief, page 9), the claimed                        
                 invention is directed to the use of Corynebacterium glutamicum AJ12036 (FERM                            
                 BP-734) bacterium which has the ability to secrete heterologous protein at least                        






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013