Ex Parte Danielson et al - Page 1



                          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today                               
                                     is not binding precedent of the Board.                                        

                         UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                 
                                                 ____________                                                      
                               BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                  
                                           AND INTERFERENCES                                                       
                                                 ____________                                                      
                      Ex parte DOUGLAS W. DANIELSON, STEVEN S. SCHUEHLE,                                           
                                            and SHIRISH A. SHAH                                                    
                                                 ____________                                                      
                                               Appeal 2006-3086                                                    
                                            Application 10/260,882                                                 
                                            Technology Center 3600                                                 
                                                 ____________                                                      
                                          Decided: September 6, 2007                                               
                                                 ____________                                                      


                Before DONALD E. ADAMS, ERIC GRIMES, and LORA M. GREEN,                                            
                Administrative Patent Judges.                                                                      
                ADAMS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                

                                           DECISION ON APPEAL                                                      
                       This appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 involves claims 2-11 and 13-32,                           
                the only claims pending in this application.  We have jurisdiction under                           
                35 U.S.C. § 6(b).                                                                                  







Page:  1  2  3  4  5  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013