The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is
not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte TADAMASA KITSUKAWA
____________
Appeal 2006-3135
Application 09/802,638
Technology Center 2600
____________
Decided: August 13, 2007
____________
Before JAMES D. THOMAS, JOSEPH F. RUGGIERO,
and HOWARD B. BLANKENSHIP, Administrative Patent Judges.
THOMAS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This appeal involves claims 1, 2, 4 through 7, and 9 through 14. We
have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. §§ 6(b) and 134(a).
As best representative of the disclosed and claimed invention,
representative independent claim 1 is reproduced below:
1. A method for allowing access to at least one Web site using an
interactive television, comprising the acts of:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013