Ex Parte 4682857 et al - Page 11

                Appeal 2006-3235                                                                                
                Reexamination Control No. 90/006,696                                                            

           1    C.  Analysis                                                                                    
           2           We decline to follow Papst-Motoren19 because, in our view, it                            
           3    misconstrues Yamamoto, which does not preclude application of the                               
           4    “broadest reasonable interpretation” standard to reexamination proceedings                      
           5    involving a patent that expired prior to entry of a Board decision on appeal.                   
           6    Instead, Yamamoto explains that claim interpretation standard applies where                     
           7    the patent owner had “an opportunity” to amend the claims, without                              
           8    indicating how long such an opportunity must last:                                              
           9                 An applicant's ability to amend his claims to avoid cited                          
          10           prior art distinguishes proceedings before the PTO from                                  
          11           proceedings in federal district courts on issued patents.  When                          
          12           an application is pending in the PTO, the applicant has the                              
          13           ability to correct errors in claim language and adjust the scope                         
          14           of claim protection as needed.  This opportunity is not available                        
          15           in an infringement action in district court.  District court[s] may                      
          16           find it necessary to interpret claims to protect only that which                         
          17           constitutes patentable subject matter to do justice between the                          
          18           parties.  [In re Prater, 415 F.2d 1393,] 1404, 162 USPQ [541,]                           
          19           550 [(CCPA 1969)].                                                                       
          20                 The same policies warranting the PTO's approach to                                 
          21           claim interpretation when an original application is involved                            
          22           have been held applicable to reissue proceedings because the                             
          23           reissue provision, 35 U.S.C. § 251, permits amendment of the                             
          24           claims to avoid prior art.  In re Reuter, 651 F.2d [751,] 756,                           
          25           210 USPQ [249,] 253-54 [(CCPA 1981)].  The reexamination                                 
          26           law, set forth below, gives patent owners the same right:                                
          27                 In any reexamination proceeding under this chapter,                                
          28                 the patent owner will be permitted to propose any                                  
                                                                                                               
                       19   Neither Papst-Motoren nor Bowles constitutes binding precedent.                     
                See Standards of Operating Procedure 2 – Publication of  Opinions and                           
                Binding Precedent  (Revision 6) (Aug. 10, 2005) (hereinafter “SOP2”)                            
                (available at: http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/dcom/bpai/ stdproced.html).                     
                                                      11                                                        

Page:  Previous  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013