Appeal 2006-3236
Inter Partes Reexamination Control No. 95/000,006
The figure shows an "edge" drawn as a slanted line between the top of
seating portion 69.4 (where point the package 12 contacts the ridge 69.1)
and the lower corner of the surface 68, instead of a line parallel to the top
and bottom edges of the surface 68 as in Requester's previous Figure 7.
The Examiner's Answer maintains the rejection and reasoning.
Issues - claims 1, 2, 5-11, and 16
Based on the contentions of the Patent Owners and the Requester, the
specific issues for claims 1 and 16 are:
Issue (1): Does Brahmbhatt disclose a "second wall surface extending
upward from an upper edge of said first wall surface, wherein said
second wall surface is inclined at an angle larger than the angle of said
first wall surface, with respect to the horizontal," as recited in
claim 1?
Issue (2): Does Brahmbhatt disclose a "second wall surface extending
from said first wall surface in a direction away from said first surface
of said main body, wherein said second wall surface is inclined at an
angle larger than the angle of said first wall surface, with respect to
the horizontal," as recited in claim 16?
Issue (3): Does Brahmbhatt disclose a "second wall surface . . . to
limit horizontal movement of the semiconductor integrated circuit
device," as recited in claims 1 and 16?
- 14 -
Page: Previous 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013