The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication in a law journal and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte BOZIDAR JANKO and KAMALESH PATEL
____________
Appeal 2006-3266
Application 10/418,405
Technology Center 3600
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before ANITA PELLMAN GROSS, LINDA E. HORNER, and ANTON W.
FETTING, Administrative Patent Judges.
GROSS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Janko and Patel (Appellants) appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
Examiner's final rejection of claim 1. Claim 2 has been objected to by the
Examiner.
Appellants' invention relates to a method of displaying video signal
errors in the area of viewer significance in a picture representing the video
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013