The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte SUNDEEP BHAN, JEFF FENIGSTEIN, and JOHN ALFANO ____________ Appeal 2006-3269 Application 10/734,811 Technology Center 3600 ____________ Decided: March 7, 2007 ____________ Before TERRY J. OWENS, JENNIFER D. BAHR, and LINDA E. HORNER, Administrative Patent Judges. HORNER, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL STATEMENT OF THE CASE The Appellants seek our review under 35 U.S.C. § 134 (2002) of the Examiner’s final rejection of claims 1-6, 8, 10-15, 17, and 18, all of the pending claims in the application. We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b) (2002).Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013