Ex Parte Zhou et al - Page 1



                     The opinion in support of the decision being entered today            
                             is not binding precedent of the Board.                        

                    UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                              
                                       ____________                                        
                        BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                 
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                        
                                       ____________                                        
                                 Ex parte DERONG ZHOU,                                     
                                     JOHN P. BORZIO,                                       
                                GREGORY M. JURSICH, and                                    
                                  EARLE R. KEBBEKUS                                        
                                       ____________                                        
                                     Appeal 2006-3270                                      
                                   Application 10/369,089                                  
                                  Technology Center 1700                                   
                                       ____________                                        
                                    Decided:  July 3, 2007                                 
                                       ____________                                        

             Before, CHARLES F. WARREN, THOMAS A. WALTZ, and                               
             JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judges.                               
             SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.                                           

                                  DECISION ON APPEAL                                       
                                    Statement of the Case                                  
                  This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from a final rejection of        
             claims 1-8.  We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6.                        





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013