Appeal Number: 2006-3291 Application Number: 10/178,845 This structure is defined, therefore, by the anatomical structure of a seat device user, and by where that user positions a worn belt, in particular, where the lower edge of the belt is on the user’s back. Both the user’s position with respect to the seat and the belt position are variable by user. The difference in height between where a large person with substantial hip width and buttocks would position the lower edge of a belt and where a petite person with diminutive hip width and buttocks would so position a belt is at least several inches. A duty belt rests on the user’s hips and buttocks so that its lower edge would generally be worn at a height relatively close to where the wearer’s sacrum begins. The height along the seat at which a large person’s sacrum would begin would therefore be above the position at which a petite person’s sacrum would begin, and thus the position at which a petite person would position the lower edge of a belt. Davis shows a seat device whose back has an upper portion with substantial thickness that forms a pillow (fig. 4, ref. 44 and col. 4, l. 63 to col. 5, l. 12). Davis indicates that the intended use of the pillow is lumbar support (col. 5, ll. 6-7). This statement of intended use does not alter the structural description of the upper portion. The upper portion of Davis’s seat would touch different users at different parts of the back, and in particular, once Davis’s seat was positioned to support a large person, even were that large person to position the pillow in the lumbar region, a significantly smaller person would encounter that pillow in the thoracic region instead, absent any further adjustment of the seat. 6Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013