The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte JOHN H. BRENNAN
GREGORY P. DILLON,
ELMIRA HEIGHTS,
TUDOR C. GHEORGHIU and
MICHAEL J. VAYANSKY
____________
Appeal 2006-3301
Application 10/606,509
Technology Center 1700
____________
Decided: January 24, 2007
____________
Before PETER F. KRATZ, CATHERINE Q. TIMM, and LINDA M.
GAUDETTE, Administrative Patent Judges.
KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
ORDER REMANDING TO THE EXAMINER
This appeal involves claims 1, 2, 4-6, 8-11, 15-20, and 22-27. We
remand the application to the Examiner for consideration and explanation of
issues raised by the record. 37 C.F.R. §§ 41.35(b) and 41.50(a)(1). In
particular, we remand this application to the Examiner to consider the
Page: 1 2 3 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013