Appeal 2006-3311
Application 10/392,525
1 The rejection of claims 9, 11, and 13-14 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as
2 being unpatentable over DeMay and Collins, further in view of Thiolat, is
3 AFFIRMED.
4 The rejection of claims 9, 11, and 13 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as
5 being anticipated by Thiolat is AFFIRMED.
6 DECISION
7 The Examiner's rejections of claims 1, 5, 7-11, and 13-15 are all
8 AFFIRMED.
9 No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with
10 this appeal may be extended under 37 C.F.R. § 1.136(a).
11 AFFIRMED
12
13
14
15 JOHN S. PRATT, ESQ
16 KILPATRICK STOCKTON, LLP
17 1100 PEACHTREE STREET
18 ATLANTA GA 30309
21
Page: Previous 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
Last modified: September 9, 2013