1 The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
2 is not binding precedent of the Board
3
4 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
5 ____________________
6
7 BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
8 AND INTERFERENCES
9 ____________________
10
11 Ex parte PETRUS CLEMENS MARIA PANNEKEET
12 ____________________
13
14 Appeal 2006-3317
15 Application 10/681,826
16 Technology Center 3700
17 ____________________
18
19 Decided: September 12, 2007
20 ____________________
21
22 Before: TERRY J. OWENS, MURRIEL E. CRAWFORD and
23 JENNIFER D. BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges.
24
25 CRAWFORD, Administrative Patent Judge.
26
27
28 DECISION ON APPEAL
29
30 STATEMENT OF CASE
31
32 Appellant appeals under 35 U.S.C. § 134 (2002) from a final rejection
33 of claims 1 to 6. We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b) (2002).
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013