Ex Parte Pannekeet - Page 1



           1              The opinion in support of the decision being entered today                             
           2                        is not binding precedent of the Board                                        
           3                                                                                                     
           4            UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                
           5                               ____________________                                                  
           6                                                                                                     
           7                  BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                 
           8                               AND INTERFERENCES                                                     
           9                               ____________________                                                  
          10                                                                                                     
          11                Ex parte PETRUS CLEMENS MARIA PANNEKEET                                              
          12                               ____________________                                                  
          13                                                                                                     
          14                                  Appeal 2006-3317                                                   
          15                                Application 10/681,826                                               
          16                               Technology Center 3700                                                
          17                               ____________________                                                  
          18                                                                                                     
          19                             Decided: September 12, 2007                                             
          20                               ____________________                                                  
          21                                                                                                     
          22    Before:  TERRY J. OWENS, MURRIEL E. CRAWFORD and                                                 
          23    JENNIFER D. BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                  
          24                                                                                                     
          25    CRAWFORD, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                           
          26                                                                                                     
          27                                                                                                     
          28                               DECISION ON APPEAL                                                    
          29                                                                                                     
          30                               STATEMENT OF CASE                                                     
          31                                                                                                     
          32           Appellant appeals under 35 U.S.C. § 134 (2002) from a final rejection                     
          33    of claims 1 to 6.  We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b) (2002).                           








Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013