Ex Parte Wilson - Page 2



                Appeal 2006-3320                                                                                                             
                Application 10/417,638                                                                                                       
                                                          THE INVENTION                                                                      
                        The Appellant claims a washer assembly and a nut cap assembly.  Claims 8                                             
                and 29 are illustrative:                                                                                                     
                        29. A nut cap assembly comprising,                                                                                   
                                 a) a body having longitudinal axis and an axial aperture further                                            
                comprising,                                                                                                                  
                                         i) a plurality of ends; and                                                                         
                                         ii) wrenching flats; and                                                                            
                                 b) a cap telescoped over the body and having a crimped portion                                              
                that provides an annular clamp.                                                                                              


                                                        THE REFERENCES                                                                       
                Goiny                                            US 4,969,788                                  Nov. 13, 1990                 
                Bydalek                                         US 6,435,791 B1                            Aug. 20, 2002                     

                                                         THE REJECTIONS                                                                      
                        The claims stand rejected as follows: claims 8, 9, 11-17 and 24-32 under                                             
                35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as anticipated by Goiny; claims 8-32 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e)                                             
                as anticipated by Bydalek; and claims 18-23 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as obvious                                                 
                over Goiny in view of Bydalek.                                                                                               
                                                               OPINION                                                                       
                        We reverse the aforementioned rejections and remand the application to the                                           
                Examiner.  Regarding the rejections we need to address only the independent                                                  
                                                                     2                                                                       



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013