The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication in and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ___________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ___________ Ex parte DAVID ROBERT DUDEK, JOHN MELVYN LLOYD, DAVID CAMPBELL MURRAY and PETER SANDIFORD ___________ Appeal 2006-3321 Application 09/843,381 Technology Center 3600 ___________ Decided: February 21, 2007 ___________ Before ANITA PELLMAN GROSS, ROBERT E. NAPPI and ANTON W. FETTING, Administrative Patent Judges. ANTON W. FETTING, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This appeal involves claims 1-18. Claims 19-25 have been withdrawn from consideration. We have jurisdiction over the appeal pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 134. We REVERSE and ENTER A NEW GROUND OF REJECTION PURSUANT TO 37 CFR § 41.50(b).Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013