The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte NAN-YAO SU
____________
Appeal 2006-3332
Application 10/161,519
Technology Center 3600
____________
Decided: June 12, 2007
____________
Before WILLIAM F. PATE, III, MURRIEL E. CRAWFORD, and
JENNIFER D. BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges.
BAHR, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Nan-Yao Su (Appellant) appeals under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
Examiner’s decision rejecting claims 1, 2, 4-13, and 15-22. Claims 3 and 14
have been canceled. We have jurisdiction over this appeal under 35 U.S.C.
§ 6 (2002).
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013