The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte PAUL GRADY RUSSELL
____________
Appeal 2006-3333
Application 10/324,601
Technology Center 3700
____________
Decided: March 27, 2007
____________
Before EDWARD C. KIMLIN, BRADLEY R. GARRIS, and
LINDA M. GAUDETTE, Administrative Patent Judges.
GARRIS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
Appellant appeals the final rejection of claims 1, 9, 10, 13-18, 24-32,
and 35-40 under 35 U.S.C. § 134.1 We have jurisdiction over the appeal
pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 6(b).
We AFFIRM-IN-PART.
1 On pages 22-23 of the Brief, Appellant discusses the claims objected to and
the claims withdrawn by restriction. Appellant has not asked the Board to
act with regard to these claims. Nevertheless, the matters concerning these
claims, objection and restriction, are petitionable, not appealable matters.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013