Ex Parte Shintani et al - Page 8

                Appeal 2006-3341                                                                             
                Application 10/266,491                                                                       

                                         CONCLUSION OF LAW                                                   
                      On the record before us, Appellants have not sustained their burden of                 
                establishing that that Examiner's rejection is erroneous.                                    
                      No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with                     
                this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR § 1.136(a)(1)(iv).                                  

                                                DECISION                                                     
                      The Examiner's rejection of claims 22 through 31 is affirmed.                          

                                                AFFIRMED                                                     


                JL                                                                                           

                ELD                                                                                          


                ROGITZ & ASSOCIATES                                                                          
                750 B STREET                                                                                 
                SUITE 3120                                                                                   
                SAN DIEGO CA 92101                                                                           








                                                     8                                                       

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8

Last modified: September 9, 2013