Appeal 2006-3341 Application 10/266,491 CONCLUSION OF LAW On the record before us, Appellants have not sustained their burden of establishing that that Examiner's rejection is erroneous. No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR § 1.136(a)(1)(iv). DECISION The Examiner's rejection of claims 22 through 31 is affirmed. AFFIRMED JL ELD ROGITZ & ASSOCIATES 750 B STREET SUITE 3120 SAN DIEGO CA 92101 8Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Last modified: September 9, 2013