Appeal 2006-3402
Application 10/397,949
For the above reasons, Appellants’ arguments do not demonstrate the
Examiner erred in rejecting claims 1-4 and 9 as unpatentable over Knox-
Sigh in view of Hyun and claims 5-8 as unpatentable over Knox-Sigh in
view of Hyun and Muller. The rejections are sustained.
SUMMARY
The decision of the Examiner to reject claims 1-9 is affirmed.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with
this appeal may be extended under 37 C.F.R. § 1.136(a). See 37 C.F.R.
§ 1.136(a)(1)(iv) (2006).
AFFIRMED
hh
PHILIP S. JOHNSON
JOHNSON & JOHNSON
ONE JOHNSON & JOHNSON PLAZA
NEW BRUNSWICK, NJ 08933-7003
6
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6
Last modified: September 9, 2013