The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________________ Ex parte WIT CEZARY BUSHKO and SREEGANESH RAMASWAMY ____________________ Appeal 2006-3404 Application 10/601,7151 Technology Center 2800 ____________________ Decided: April 9, 2007 ____________________ Before: KENNETH W. HAIRSTON, ALLEN R. MACDONALD, and JAY P. LUCAS, Administrative Patent Judges. LUCAS, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL STATEMENT OF CASE Appellants appeal from a final rejection of claims 1-11 and 13-33 under authority of 35 U.S.C. § 134 (2002). The Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences (BPAI) has jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b) (2002). 1 Application filed June 23, 2003. Appellants do not claim benefit under 35 U.S.C. § 119 or § 120. The real party in interest is General Electric Co.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013