Appeal 2006-3421
Application 09/751,889
forecasting scenario using parameters of the design-supporting scenario
indicating that said system satisfies the performance standard” as set forth in
the claims on appeal.
The future-forecasting teachings of Brockel are merely cumulative to
the express as well as the implied teachings already found in Henderson.
CONCLUSION OF LAW
As indicated supra, the obviousness of the claimed subject matter is
demonstrated by the teachings of Henderson considered alone.
DECISION
The obviousness rejection of claims 1, 3 to 5, 9, 11, 13, and 15 is
affirmed.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with
this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR § 1.136(a)(1)(iv).
6
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013