The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte AKIHISA INOUE, WEI ZHANG, and TAO ZHANG ____________ Appeal 2007-2658 Application 10/451,143 Technology Center 1700 ____________ Decided: September 18, 2007 ____________ Before CHUNG K. PAK, CATHERINE Q. TIMM, and LINDA M. GAUDETTE, Administrative Patent Judges. PAK, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the Examiner's final rejection of claims 2, and 6 through 8. Claim 4, the other claim pending in the above-identified application, stands withdrawn from consideration by the Examiner as being directed to a non-elected invention. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 6.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013