Ex Parte Lin - Page 1



                 The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                      
                          for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                             
                                                ____________                                                     
                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                
                                                ____________                                                     
                              BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                 
                                           AND INTERFERENCES                                                     
                                                ____________                                                     
                                              Ex parte QIAN LIN                                                  
                                                ____________                                                     
                                              Appeal 2007-0017                                                   
                                           Application 10/074,1791                                               
                                           Technology Center 2600                                                
                                                ____________                                                     
                                           Decided: April 11, 2007                                               
                                                ____________                                                     
                Before JAMES D. THOMAS, JOHN C. MARTIN, and LEE E. BARRETT,                                      
                Administrative Patent Judges.                                                                    
                BARRETT, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                            
                                           DECISION ON APPEAL                                                    
                       This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134(a) from the Final                      
                Rejection of claims 14-19 and 27.  Claims 1, 2, 20, and 25 have been                             
                canceled.  Claims 3-13, 21-24, and 26 have been allowed.  We have                                
                jurisdiction pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 6(b).                                                       
                       We reverse.                                                                               
                                                                                                                
                       1 Application filed February 12, 2002, entitled "Method and System                        
                for Assessing the Photo Quality of a Captured Image in a Digital Still                           
                Camera."                                                                                         



Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013