The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
____________
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte QIAN LIN
____________
Appeal 2007-0017
Application 10/074,1791
Technology Center 2600
____________
Decided: April 11, 2007
____________
Before JAMES D. THOMAS, JOHN C. MARTIN, and LEE E. BARRETT,
Administrative Patent Judges.
BARRETT, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134(a) from the Final
Rejection of claims 14-19 and 27. Claims 1, 2, 20, and 25 have been
canceled. Claims 3-13, 21-24, and 26 have been allowed. We have
jurisdiction pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 6(b).
We reverse.
1 Application filed February 12, 2002, entitled "Method and System
for Assessing the Photo Quality of a Captured Image in a Digital Still
Camera."
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013