Appeal 2007-0041
Application 10/000,843
moving the working rolls in the horizontal direction for adjusting the gap width of
the rolling gap. It is the combined teachings of Nakajima, Yasuda and Fischer,
rather than the individual teachings of each reference, on which the rejection is
based.
In view of the foregoing, we will sustain the rejection of the Examiner. The
decision of the Examiner is affirmed.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with
this appeal may be extended under 37 C.F.R. § 1.136(a). See 37 C.F.R.
§ 1.136(a)(1)(iv) (2006).
AFFIRMED
JRG
Friedrich Kueffner
317 Madison Avenue
Suite 910
New York, NY 10017
4
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4
Last modified: September 9, 2013