The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte WILLIAM D. SPROUL, MICHAEL E. GRAHAM,
THOMAS G. PARHAM, ROLF S. BERGMAN,
and RANDOLPH E. MAXWELL
____________
Appeal 2007-0075
Application 10/759,299
Technology Center 1700
____________
Decided: February 28, 2007
____________
Before EDWARD C. KIMLIN, CHUNG K. PAK, and
CHARLES F. WARREN, Administrative Patent Judges.
PAK, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the Examiner's final
rejection of claims 1 through 15 and 18 through 20, all of the claims pending
in the above-identified application. We have jurisdiction pursuant to
35 U.S.C. § 6.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013