Ex Parte Tutin et al - Page 1



                 The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                      
                          for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                             

                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                
                                                ____________                                                     
                              BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                 
                                           AND INTERFERENCES                                                     
                                                ____________                                                     
                                            Ex parte KIM TUTIN,                                                  
                                    AUGIE RODRIGUEZ, JOHN HINES,                                                 
                               KURT GABRIELSON, CORNEL HAGIOPOL,                                                 
                               RAMJI SRNINIVASAN AND RANDY WHITE                                                 
                                                ____________                                                     
                                              Appeal 2007-0106                                                   
                                            Application 10/453,932                                               
                                           Technology Center 1700                                                
                                                ____________                                                     
                                            Decided: May 14, 2007                                                
                                                ____________                                                     
                Before EDWARD C. KIMLIN, CHUNG K. PAK, and PETER F. KRATZ,                                       
                Administrative Patent Judges.                                                                    
                KIMLIN, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                             


                                           DECISION ON APPEAL                                                    
                       This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 4-27.  Claims 1                      
                and 11 are illustrative:                                                                         
                       1.  An aqueous binder composition for making glass fiber products                         
                comprising a substantially infinitely water-dilutable or dispersible                             
                thermosetting esterification reaction adduct of a monomeric polycarboxylic                       




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013