The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte DIETER REINEHR,
GEORGES METZGER, PETER MICHAELIS
And HELMUT LUTHER
____________
Appeal 2007-0107
Application 10/013,885
Technology Center 1700
____________
Decided: June 22, 2007
____________
Before CHUNG K. PAK. PETER F. KRATZ, and CATHERINE Q. TIMM,
Administrative Patent Judges.
KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
Appellants appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the Examiner’s refusal
to allow claims 1, 5-7, 17, and 28-31, the only claims that remain pending in
this application. The claims of this application were twice rejected. We
have jurisdiction pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 6.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013