The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte VOLKER DIEHL, ULRICH JAGER, JURGEN SCHRODER, and JOACHIM THIEL ____________ Appeal 2007-0125 Application 10/447,227 Technology Center 1700 ____________ Decided: May 24, 2007 ____________ Before EDWARD C. KIMLIN, CHUNG K. PAK, and PETER F. KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judges. PAK, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is an appeal from the Examiner's final rejection of claims 1 through 20, all of the claims pending the above-identified application. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 35 U.S.C. §§ 6 and 134.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013