The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte HARIPRASAD SREEDHARAMURTHY,
MOHSEN BANAN, and
JOHN D. HOLDER
____________
Appeal 2007-0138
Application 10/039,459
Technology Center 1700
____________
Decided: May 2, 2007
____________
Before CHARLES F. WARREN, PETER F. KRATZ, and
CATHERINE Q. TIMM, Administrative Patent Judges.
TIMM, Administrative Patent Judge.
ORDER REMANDING TO THE EXAMINER
Appellants appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134(a) from the Examiner’s final
rejection of claims 1-14. We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b).
This appeal is not yet ripe for a decision on appeal because it is
unclear what rejections are being maintained on appeal.
Page: 1 2 3 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013