Ex Parte Sreedharamurthy et al - Page 1

                 The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                   
                          for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                          

                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                             
                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                               
                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                    
                            Ex parte HARIPRASAD SREEDHARAMURTHY,                                              
                                          MOHSEN BANAN, and                                                   
                                            JOHN D. HOLDER                                                    
                                             Appeal 2007-0138                                                 
                                           Application 10/039,459                                             
                                          Technology Center 1700                                              
                                           Decided:  May 2, 2007                                              

                Before CHARLES F. WARREN, PETER F. KRATZ, and                                                 
                CATHERINE Q. TIMM, Administrative Patent Judges.                                              
                TIMM, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                            

                               ORDER REMANDING TO THE EXAMINER                                                
                      Appellants appeal under 35 U.S.C.  134(a) from the Examiner’s final                    
                rejection of claims 1-14.  We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C.  6(b).                       
                      This appeal is not yet ripe for a decision on appeal because it is                      
                unclear what rejections are being maintained on appeal.                                       

Page:  1  2  3  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013