The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding
precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte CHRISTINE WAI HAN CHAN
____________
Appeal 2007-0153
Application 09/792,918
Technology Center 2100
____________
Decided: July 31, 2007
____________
Before JOSEPH F. RUGGIERO, LANCE LEONARD BARRY, and
MAHSHID D. SAADAT, Administrative Patent Judges.
SAADAT, Administrative Patent Judge.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134(a) from the
Examiner’s Final Rejection of claims 1-5, 7-15, 17-32, and 35-42. Claims 6,
16, 33, and 34 have been canceled. We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C.
§ 6(b).
Appellant’s invention generally relates to protecting resources
available on a network and more specifically, to assessing coverage of
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013