Ex Parte Hatwar et al - Page 1



                 The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                  
                         for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                          

                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                            
                                               ____________                                                  
                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                              
                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                   
                                               ____________                                                  
                                    Ex parte TUKARAM K. HATWAR,                                              
                                        J. RAMON VARGAS AND                                                  
                                          VIKTOR V. JARIKOV                                                  
                                               ____________                                                  
                                             Appeal 2007-0162                                                
                                          Application 10/690,940                                             
                                          Technology Center 1700                                             
                                               ____________                                                  
                                         Decided: January 10, 2007                                           
                                               ____________                                                  

                Before EDWARD C. KIMLIN, BRADLEY R. GARRIS, and                                              
                PETER F. KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                
                KIMLIN, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                         


                                         DECISION ON APPEAL                                                  
                      This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1-8, 13, and 17-20.               
                Claims 9-12 and 14-16 have been objected to by the Examiner.  Claim 1 is                     
                illustrative:                                                                                





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013