Ex Parte Hendrix et al - Page 1



                 The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                   
                          for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                          

                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                             
                                               ____________                                                   
                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                               
                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                    
                                               ____________                                                   
                             Ex parte MARC HENDRIX and MARC KELLENS                                           
                                               ____________                                                   
                                             Appeal 2007-0165                                                 
                                           Application 10/207,122                                             
                                          Technology Center 1700                                              
                                               ____________                                                   
                                          Decided: January 4, 2007                                            
                                               ____________                                                   

                Before EDWARD C. KIMLIN, CHUNK K. PAK, and                                                    
                JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative Judges.                                                      
                KIMLIN, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                          


                                         DECISION ON APPEAL                                                   
                      This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 13-17.  Claim 13 is                
                illustrative:                                                                                 
                             13.     An installation for the dry fractionation of edible oils, fats           
                and related products, comprising:                                                             
                             -     a crystallizer,                                                            





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013