The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte MICHAEL P. SURH, WILLIAM D. WILSON,
TROY W. BARBEE, JR, and STEPHEN M. LANE
____________
Appeal 2007-0169
Application 10/262,015
Technology Center 1700
____________
Decided: May 11, 2007
____________
Before EDWARD C. KIMLIN, CHUNG K. PAK, and
THOMAS A. WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judges.
PAK, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
Examiner's refusal to allow claims 1 through 3, 5, 6, and 24, all of the claims
pending in the above-identified application. We have jurisdiction pursuant
to 35 U.S.C. § 6.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013