Appeal No. 2007-0187 Page 6 Application No. 10/121,148 Waldmann. Specifically, the Examiner finds that Paglia teaches an immortalized DC capable of inducing antigen-specific T cell responses in vivo. Answer, page 5. Accordingly, the Examiner asserts (id.) “[i]t would have been prima facie obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made to immortalize, as taught by Paglia . . . the DC of [Waldmann] . . . .” We disagree. As discussed above, Waldmann clearly teaches away from immortalizing a DC according to Paglia. “A reference may be said to teach away when a person of ordinary skill, upon reading the reference, would be discouraged from following the path set out in the reference, or would be led in a direction divergent from the path that was taken by the applicant.” In re Kahn, 441 F.3d 977, 990, 78 USPQ2d 1329, 1338 (Fed. Cir. 2006) (quoting In re Gurley, 27 F.3d 551, 553, 31 USPQ2d 1130, 1131 (Fed. Cir. 1994)). In contrast, instead of producing immortalized DC, Waldmann teaches the use of genetically modified ES (embryonic stem) cells “to generate mutant DC on demand.” Waldmann, page 4. Since Waldmann does not teach dendritic cells as defined by Appellants’ specification3, and teaches away from producing an immortalized DC according to Paglia, we find that the Examiner failed to meet his burden of providing the evidence necessary to establish a prima facie case of obviousness. Accordingly we reverse the rejection of claims 15-28 under 35 3 In addition, we note Paglia teaches that the CB1 cells described “may represent an intermediate stage of DC maturation.” Paglia, page 1897, column 2. More specifically, Paglia teaches that the CB1 cells may represent a DC precursor rather than a mature DC, requiring GM-CSF for increased expression of MHC class II molecules in order to exhibit in vitro antigen-specific APC activity. Paglia, page 1899, paragraph bridging columns 1 and 2, and second full paragraph of column 2. Accordingly, it is our opinion that Paglia does not teach dendritic cells as defined by Appellants’ specification.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013