The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte JOHN A. BARBUS, DEREK S. DENGEL, DENNIS B. BOYLE, and NICHOLAS M. RYMARCHYK JR. ____________ Appeal 2007-0200 Application 10/445,466 Technology Center 1700 ____________ Decided: August 14, 2007 ____________ Before WILLIAM F. PATE, III, TERRY J. OWENS, and JENNIFER D. BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges. BAHR, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL STATEMENT OF THE CASE John A. Barbus et al. (Appellants) appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the Examiner's decision rejecting claims 1-20, the only pending claims. We have jurisdiction over this appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 6 (2002).Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013