The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte JOHN A. BARBUS, DEREK S. DENGEL, DENNIS B. BOYLE,
and NICHOLAS M. RYMARCHYK JR.
____________
Appeal 2007-0200
Application 10/445,466
Technology Center 1700
____________
Decided: August 14, 2007
____________
Before WILLIAM F. PATE, III, TERRY J. OWENS, and JENNIFER D.
BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges.
BAHR, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
John A. Barbus et al. (Appellants) appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from
the Examiner's decision rejecting claims 1-20, the only pending claims. We
have jurisdiction over this appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 6 (2002).
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013