The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board
___________
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
___________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
___________
Ex parte ANTHONY T. VU
___________
Appeal 2007-0204
Application 10/938,9661
___________
ON BRIEF
___________
Before THOMAS, BARRETT, and RUGGIERO, Administrative Patent
Judges.
BARRETT, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134(a) from the final
rejection of claims 51-54 and the objection to claim 45.
We affirm.
1 Application for patent filed September 10, 2004, entitled "Real-Time
Localization Monitoring, Triggering, and Acquisition of 3D MRI."
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013