Appeal 2007-0207 Application 10/054,009 7, ll. 52-54). Thus, the obviousness rejection of claims 34 through 36 is sustained. The obviousness rejection of claims 7, 11 through 20, 22 through 31 and 33 is sustained because appellants have not presented any patentability arguments for these claims. DECISION The decision of the examiner rejecting claims 1 through 6, 9, 10 and 21 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) is reversed, and the decision of the examiner rejecting claims 7, 11 through 20, 22 through 31 and 33 through 36 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) is affirmed. No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 C.F.R. § 1.136 (a) (1) (iv). AFFIRMED-IN-PART PGC Harness, Dickey & Pierce, P.L.C. P.O. Box 828 Bloomfield Hills, MI 48303 5Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5
Last modified: September 9, 2013