Appeal 2007-0207
Application 10/054,009
7, ll. 52-54). Thus, the obviousness rejection of claims 34 through 36 is
sustained.
The obviousness rejection of claims 7, 11 through 20, 22 through 31
and 33 is sustained because appellants have not presented any patentability
arguments for these claims.
DECISION
The decision of the examiner rejecting claims 1 through 6, 9, 10 and
21 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) is reversed, and the decision of the examiner
rejecting claims 7, 11 through 20, 22 through 31 and 33 through 36 under
35 U.S.C. § 103(a) is affirmed.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with
this appeal may be extended under 37 C.F.R. § 1.136 (a) (1) (iv).
AFFIRMED-IN-PART
PGC
Harness, Dickey & Pierce, P.L.C.
P.O. Box 828
Bloomfield Hills, MI 48303
5
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5
Last modified: September 9, 2013