Ex Parte Fukui - Page 1



                       The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                 
                               for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                         
                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                  
                                                  __________                                                      
                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                   
                                          AND INTERFERENCES                                                       
                                                  __________                                                      
                                           Ex parte KOUTA FUKUI                                                   
                                                  __________                                                      
                                               Appeal 2007-0218                                                   
                                            Application 10/730,143                                                
                                            Technology Center 1700                                                
                                                  __________                                                      
                                                   ON BRIEF                                                       
                                                  __________                                                      
                Before SCHEINER, ADAMS, and GRIMES, Administrative Patent Judges.                                 
                GRIMES, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                              


                                           DECISION ON APPEAL                                                     
                       This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 involving claims to a                              
                photothermographic material.  The Examiner has rejected the claims as                             
                obvious.  We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b).  We affirm.                                
                                               BACKGROUND                                                         
                       The specification describes “a photothermographic material                                 
                comprising a photosensitive silver halide, a non-photosensitive organic silver                    
                salt, a reducing agent, and a binder on at least one surface of a support”                        
                (Specification 5).  The specification states that the photosensitive silver                       




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013