The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
____________
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte JOHN S. MARESCA,
ROBERT D. HAYES, BRENT R. JENSEN, EDWARD KOBEDA,
ERIC T. LAMBERT, MICHAEL J. WHITNEY,
KATHERINE J. PEARSALL, BENJAMIN J. STEELE JR.,
and PAUL A. ZULPA
____________
Appeal 2007-0223
Application 09/752,0901
Technology Center 2100
____________
Decided: July 19, 2007
____________
Before LEE E. BARRETT, JOSEPH L. DIXON, and
HOWARD B. BLANKENSHIP, Administrative Patent Judges.
BARRETT, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134(a) from the Final
Rejection of claims 44-79. Claims 1-43 have been canceled. We have
jurisdiction pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 6(b).
We affirm-in-part.
1 Application for patent filed December 29, 2000, entitled "Method
and System for Providing an End-to-End Business Process for Electronic
Supplier Qualification and Quality Management," now U.S. Publication
US 2002/0087372 ('372 publication), published July 4, 2002.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013