Appeal 2007-0224
Application 09/754,785
THE REFERENCES
The Examiner relies upon the following references as evidence of
anticipation and unpatentability:
John Levine, Linkers and Loaders, Chapter 6, June 1999, available at
http://www.ieee.com/linker/linker06.txt, 9 pages, (last visited Aug. 15,
2005).
Breslau US 6,185,733 B1 Feb. 6, 2001
The Examiner refers to the following reference as extrinsic evidence
not relied upon:
Glen Overby, Upgrading Your Minix System, (1990), available at
http://www.funet.fi/pub/minix/unsorted/upgrading.txt
10 pages, (last visited Jan. 12, 2006).
THE REJECTIONS
The following rejections are on appeal before us:
1. Claims 1-41, and 43-60 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as
being anticipated by Levine.
2. Claim 42 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being
unpatentable over the teachings of Levine in view of Breslau.
Rather than repeat the arguments of Appellant or the Examiner, we
make reference to the Briefs and the Answer for the respective details
thereof.
OPINION
Only those arguments actually made by Appellant have been
considered in this decision. It is our view, after consideration of the record
3
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013