Ex Parte Dege et al - Page 3



            Appeal 2007-0229                                                                                 
            Application 10/968,436                                                                           
                         the first door movable between an open position, wherein                            
                         at least one meal container may be loaded into the                                  
                         housing via the first opening, and a closed position,                               
                         wherein the first door covers the first opening, thereby                            
                         limiting heat transfer from within the housing; and                                 
                                a second door operably connected with the                                    
                         housing, the second door movable between an open                                    
                         position, wherein at least one meal container as received                           
                         within the housing from the first opening may be                                    
                         removed from within the housing via the second opening,                             
                         and a closed position, wherein the second door covers the                           
                         second opening, thereby limiting heat transfer from                                 
                         within the housing.                                                                 

                                            THE REJECTIONS                                                   
                   The Examiner relies upon the following as evidence in support of the                      
            rejections:                                                                                      
                    Hill                     US 2,812,227                  Nov. 5, 1957                      
                    Jacober                  US 4,706,856                 Nov. 17, 1987                      
                    Kirkendall               US 4,812,054                  Mar. 14, 1989                     
                    Lippincott               US D371,942                   Jul. 23, 1996                     
                    Davis                    US 6,116,456                  Sep. 12, 2000                     

                   The following rejections are before us for review.                                        
                1. Claims 1-2 and 13-14 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as anticipated               
                   by Davis.                                                                                 
                2. Claims 3 and 4 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as unpatentable over               
                   Davis.                                                                                    


                                                     3                                                       



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013