Appeal 2007-0230
Application 09/506,676
DECISION
The anticipation rejection of claims 21 to 26 and 29 to 31 is affirmed.
The obviousness rejection of claims 27 and 28 is affirmed because the
Appellant has not presented any patentability arguments for these claims
apart from the arguments presented for claim 21.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with
this appeal may be extended under 37 C.F.R. § 1.136(a)(1)(iv).
AFFIRMED
tdl
Ware Fressola Van Der Sluys & Adolphson, LLP
Bradford Green, Bldg. 5
755 Main Street, P.O. Box 224
Monroe, CT 06468
5
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5
Last modified: September 9, 2013