Ex Parte Iwasaki et al - Page 3

                Appeal 2007-0236                                                                              
                Application 09/934,474                                                                        

                and the mist of pure water supplied from said supply unit third supply unit                   
                [sic] to form a polishing mixture, said mixing unit supplying the polishing                   
                mixture onto said major surface of said polishing table.                                      
                      2.  An apparatus including a polishing solution supply system, the                      
                polishing solution supply system comprising:                                                  
                      a polishing table for placing a semiconductor substrate on a major                      
                surface thereof;                                                                              
                      a first supply unit for spraying and supplying a mist comprising                        
                abrasive slurry to a specified location on said major surface of said polishing               
                table;                                                                                        
                      a second supply unit for spraying and supplying a mist comprising                       
                additive onto said major surface of said polishing table so as to mix with the                
                mist of abrasive slurry supplied from said first supply unit; and                             
                      a third supply unit for spraying and supplying a mist comprising pure                   
                water onto said major surface of said polishing table so as to mix with the                   
                mist of abrasive slurry supplied from said first supply unit and with the mist                
                of additive supplied from said second supply unit.                                            
                                                                                                             
                      The references set forth below are relied upon by the Examiner as                       
                evidence of obviousness:                                                                      
                Murphy    US 5,478,435  Dec. 26, 1995                                                         
                Chamberlin    US 5,997,392  Dec. 7, 1999                                                      
                      Claims 1-19 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being                              
                unpatentable over Murphy in view of Chamberlin.1                                              


                                                                                                             
                1  The Appellants have separately grouped the appealed claims in the manner                   
                indicated on page 4 of the Brief whereby the apparatus and method claims                      
                representing the Figure 8 embodiment are grouped and argued separately                        
                                                      3                                                       

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013