Appeal 2007-0241
Application 09/931,296
not, in our view, satisfy Appellants’ burden of providing evidence and/or
arguments which show how the Examiner has erred in presenting a prima
facie case of anticipation.
CONCLUSION
In summary, we have sustained the Examiner’s rejections of all the
claims on appeal. Therefore, the decision of the Examiner rejecting claims
1-4, 6-11, and 13-28 is affirmed.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with
this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR § 1.136(a)(1)(iv).
AFFIRMED
pgc
Darcell Walker
8107 Carvel Lane
Houston TX 77036
7
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Last modified: September 9, 2013