Appeal 2007-0253
Application 09/385,315
remain unconvinced by Appellant’s arguments that the Examiner erred in
rejecting the claims under 35 U.S.C. § 103.
CONCLUSION
On the record before us, Appellant fails to show that the Examiner has
erred in rejecting the claims or the rejection is not supported by a legally
sufficient basis for holding that the claimed subject would have been
obvious within the meaning of § 103(a). In view of our analysis above, we
sustain the 35 U.S.C. § 103 rejection of claims 1, 2, 4-11, 13-17, 21, and 22
over the combination of Kobayashi, Sulavuori, and Haartsen and of claims 3
and 12 over Kobayashi, Sulavuori, and Haartsen in view of the well known
in the art.
DECISION
The decision of the Examiner rejecting claims 1-17, 21, and 22 under
35 U.S.C. § 103 is affirmed.
6
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013