The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte SIEW-HONG YANG-HUFFMAN
____________
Appeal 2007-0256
Application 10/012,713
Technology Center 2100
____________
Decided: February 27, 2007
____________
Before KENNETH W. HAIRSTON, ALLEN R. MACDONALD, and
JAY P. LUCAS, Administrative Patent Judges.
HAIRSTON, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Appellant’s appeal is under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the final rejection of
claims 1 to 20. We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b).
Appellant has invented a system and method to collect usage data
from at least one node of a network. An administrative application identifies
at least one node of the network, and the system and method autonomously
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013