Ex Parte Broussard - Page 2

                Appeal 2007-0279                                                                               
                Application 10/042,079                                                                         
                      The Examiner rejects the pending claims as follows:                                      
                A.  Claims 1, 7, 10 through 14, 20, 23 through 27, 33, and 36 through 39                       
                stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102 (e) as being anticipated by Krishna.                      
                B. Claims 2, 4 through 6, 8, 9, 15, 17 through 19, 21, 22, 28, 30 through                      
                32, 34, and 35 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 (a) as being                               
                unpatentable over the combination of Krishna and Green.                                        
                C. Claims 3, 16, and 29 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 (a) as being                      
                unpatentable over the combination of Krishna, Green and Evans.                                 
                      The Examiner relies on the following references:                                         
                Lewis     US 5,590,331  Dec. 31, 1996                                                          
                Lee     US 2002/0147763 A1 Oct. 10, 2002                                                       
                                                                     (filed Oct. 10, 2000)                     
                Krishna    US 2003/0051233 A1 Mar. 13, 2003                                                    
                                                                                (filed Sept. 13, 2001)         
                Evans     US 6,836,884 B1  Dec. 28, 2004                                                       
                                                                                  (filed Jun. 4, 2001)         
                Dale Green, Trail: The Reflection API, The Java Tutorial (Nov. 27, 1999),                      
                http://java.sun.com/docs/books/tutorial/reflect/, 1-36.                                        
                      Independent claim 1 is illustrative and representative of the                            
                Appellant’s invention.  It reads as follows:                                                   
                      1.  A method in a data processing system for generating a generic                        
                compilation interface, from a first object-oriented software package, said                     
                method comprising the steps of:                                                                
                      identifying all public classes included in said first object-oriented                    
                software package;                                                                              
                      for each of said public classes, identifying all public entities included                
                in each of said public classes;                                                                




                                                      2                                                        

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013