Appeal 2007-0279 Application 10/042,079 The Examiner rejects the pending claims as follows: A. Claims 1, 7, 10 through 14, 20, 23 through 27, 33, and 36 through 39 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102 (e) as being anticipated by Krishna. B. Claims 2, 4 through 6, 8, 9, 15, 17 through 19, 21, 22, 28, 30 through 32, 34, and 35 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 (a) as being unpatentable over the combination of Krishna and Green. C. Claims 3, 16, and 29 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 (a) as being unpatentable over the combination of Krishna, Green and Evans. The Examiner relies on the following references: Lewis US 5,590,331 Dec. 31, 1996 Lee US 2002/0147763 A1 Oct. 10, 2002 (filed Oct. 10, 2000) Krishna US 2003/0051233 A1 Mar. 13, 2003 (filed Sept. 13, 2001) Evans US 6,836,884 B1 Dec. 28, 2004 (filed Jun. 4, 2001) Dale Green, Trail: The Reflection API, The Java Tutorial (Nov. 27, 1999), http://java.sun.com/docs/books/tutorial/reflect/, 1-36. Independent claim 1 is illustrative and representative of the Appellant’s invention. It reads as follows: 1. A method in a data processing system for generating a generic compilation interface, from a first object-oriented software package, said method comprising the steps of: identifying all public classes included in said first object-oriented software package; for each of said public classes, identifying all public entities included in each of said public classes; 2Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013