The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE __________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES __________ Ex parte JACK L. ARBISER __________ Appeal 2007-0281 Application 10/444,073 Technology Center 1600 __________ HEARD February 6, 2007 __________ Before SCHEINER, GRIMES, and LINCK, Administrative Patent Judges. GRIMES, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 involving claims to a fibrous blood separation medium. The examiner has rejected the claims as obvious. We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b). We reverse. BACKGROUND The specification discloses a “fibrous non-woven medi[um] that separates erythrocytes (commonly known as ‘red blood cells’) from other blood constituents (e.g., serum and/or plasma) in whole blood.”Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013