Ex Parte Simon - Page 1



                      The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written               
                              for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                       
                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                
                                                 __________                                                    
                            BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                 
                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                     
                                                 __________                                                    
                                        Ex parte JACK L. ARBISER                                               
                                                 __________                                                    
                                              Appeal 2007-0281                                                 
                                           Application 10/444,073                                              
                                          Technology Center 1600                                               
                                                 __________                                                    
                                          HEARD February 6, 2007                                               
                                                 __________                                                    
                Before SCHEINER, GRIMES, and LINCK, Administrative Patent Judges.                              
                GRIMES, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                           


                                          DECISION ON APPEAL                                                   
                      This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 involving claims to a fibrous                    
                blood separation medium.  The examiner has rejected the claims as obvious.                     
                We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b).  We reverse.                                      
                                              BACKGROUND                                                       
                      The specification discloses a “fibrous non-woven medi[um] that                           
                separates erythrocytes (commonly known as ‘red blood cells’) from other                        
                blood constituents (e.g., serum and/or plasma) in whole blood.”                                





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013