The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte ROBERT LEE WELLS and KENDRICK JON HUGHES
__________
Appeal 2007-0284
Application 10/454,564
Technology Center 1700
__________
DECIDED: May 30, 2007
__________
Before DEMETRA J. MILLS, ERIC GRIMES, and NANCY J. LINCK,
Administrative Patent Judges.
LINCK, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
Appellants appeal the Examiner’s 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) rejection of
claims 12 and 14-20, all pending claims in the above-identified application,
based on U.S. 6,194,363 B1 (“Murray”). We have jurisdiction to decide this
appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b).
We affirm.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013