Ex Parte Labelle et al - Page 1



                 The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                     
                          for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                            

                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                               
                                                ____________                                                    
                              BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                
                                          AND INTERFERENCES                                                     
                                                ____________                                                    
                        Ex parte CATHERINE B. LABELLE, BOON-YONG ANG,                                           
                               JOONG S. JEON, ALLISON K. HOLBROOK,                                              
                                      QI XIANG, and HUICAI ZHONG                                                
                                                ____________                                                    
                                              Appeal 2007-0287                                                  
                                           Application 10/705,347                                               
                                           Technology Center 1700                                               
                                                ____________                                                    
                                          Decided: March 16, 2007                                               
                                                ____________                                                    


                Before BRADLEY R. GARRIS, THOMAS A. WALTZ, and                                                  
                CATHERINE Q. TIMM, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                
                WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                             


                                          DECISION ON APPEAL                                                    
                       This is a decision on an appeal from the Primary Examiner’s final                        
                rejection of claims 1, 6 through 8, 14 through 16, 19, and 20, which are the                    
                only claims pending in this application.  We have jurisdiction pursuant to                      
                35 U.S.C. §§ 6 and 134.                                                                         




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013